Re: spelling corrections

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: spelling corrections
Date: 2003-03-10 18:28:45
Message-ID: 200303101828.h2AISjB15231@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 12:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Cool. How much manual review did you have to do on the tool's output?
>
> A fair bit, but not so much that it wasn't worth doing, IMHO. Some of
> that work won't need to be done again (e.g. adding PostgreSQL-specific
> words to the stop list), but some of it is inevitable (e.g. the use of
> function names in comments -- there are so many of these that adding
> them all to the stop list would likely be pointless).

You could dump out the debug symbols and add those to the list.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-03-10 18:52:28 Re: spelling corrections
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-03-10 18:11:25 Re: spelling corrections