Re: wal-debug

From: "Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: "postgres-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wal-debug
Date: 2003-03-04 07:06:45
Message-ID: 200303041236.45854.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 04 Mar 2003 3:16 am, you wrote:
> I am not doing something specially, I want to increase performance, that's
> all.
>
> and wanted to disable WAL.

If you are shooting for raw performance, it would be better if you define what
level of performance you are aiming for. Say you want 200 transaction per
second and want to achieve it, then it is a good starting point.

Optimising for performance without any aim is not that useful in the end run.
You can spend that time/energy someplace else.

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Rodrigues 2003-03-04 07:25:54 list time lag test
Previous Message Abhishek Verma 2003-03-04 06:34:11 problem : initdb is not intialising via installing postgress on mac os x