Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command

From: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Date: 2003-02-21 01:39:24
Message-ID: 20030221013924.GR1833@filer
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> UPDATE totals SET
> xmax = ss.xmax, xmin = ss.xmin, ...
> FROM
> (SELECT groupid, max(x) AS xmax, ... FROM details GROUP BY groupid) ss
> WHERE groupid = ss.groupid;

As long as any individual item that you can express in the
parenthesized (Informix) syntax can also be expressed as an element in
a SELECT, then the above is equivalent in every way to the Informix
syntax. And since SELECT allows subselects, it seems to me that the
PG syntax is complete.

My question is whether or not there's likely to be an approved
standard way of accomplishing what either syntax does. Is there
anything in the current draft that addresses this?

--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-02-21 01:50:14 Re: deleting dependencies
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-02-21 01:19:19 Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode