> Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> > Ok, if a patch were submitted to the parser to allow the syntax in
> > question would it be considered?
>
> I would vote against it ... but that's only one vote.
I would vote against it too. Please don't add a none-standard syntax
any more (I think we got enough lesson from "foo = NULL compatibilty"
with MS products).
--
Tatsuo Ishii