| From: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
| Date: | 2003-02-17 00:23:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20030217002334.GA3499@wallace.ece.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:05:20AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
>
> I don't think this is what we were out for. We've certainly been running
> with libedit for a long time without anyone ever mentioning
> /usr/include/editline. I suggest this part is taken out.
Well, I found a set of systems that install libedit (and editline) in that
location (i.e. Debian Linux). I couldn't test on the standard version of
that system without either this, or hacking a symlink into /usr/include.
Yes, BSD systems that install libedit directly in /usr/include (or into
readline), like Patrick's, don't need it, but mine do. Is there some
reason we _shouldn't_ support this configuration?
Ross
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-17 01:32:04 | Re: stats_command_string default? |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-02-16 23:56:57 | Re: location of the configuration files |