Re: Do we always need the socket file?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we always need the socket file?
Date: 2003-02-14 01:38:07
Message-ID: 200302140138.h1E1c7h07982@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Brusser wrote:
> I have Postgres 7.2.1 configured to listen on TCP/IP port.
> When the server starts up it still creates the socket file in /tmp.
> Removing this file manually does not seem to cause any problem for the
> application.
>
> Is there a way to prevent postmaster from creating this file?
> Is this really safe to remove the socket file, or would it create
> some problem that I won't necessarily see?

I guess the big question is why you don't want the file created? If you
have 'local' disabled in pg_hba.conf, it doesn't allow connections.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-02-14 01:39:13 Re: location of the configuration files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 01:29:52 Re: Someone's broken psql's connection-failure error reporting