Re: Question on hardware & server capacity

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Steve Wolfe" <nw(at)codon(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question on hardware & server capacity
Date: 2003-01-06 19:14:50
Message-ID: 200301061114.50830.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Steve,

> We're splitting the front-end across a number of machines, but all of
> the various datasets are sufficiently intertwined that they all have to be
> in the same database. I'm going to fiddle around with some of the
> available replication options and see if they're robust enough to put them
> into production.

2 other suggestions:

1. Both PostgreSQL Inc. and Command Prompt Inc. have some sort of pay-for HA
solution for Postgres. Paying them may end up being cheaper than
improvising this yourself.

2. Zapatec Inc. has acheived impressive performance gains by putting the
database on a high-speed, HA gigabit NAS server and having a few "client
servers" handle incoming queries. You may want to experiment along these
lines.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2003-01-07 03:32:52 Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage
Previous Message Tomasz Myrta 2003-01-06 11:03:19 views vs pl/pgsql