Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Date: 2002-12-11 01:55:59
Message-ID: 200212110156.gBB1u0Y07051@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Copeland wrote:
> Seems like a mistake was made. Let's (don't ya love how that sounds
> like I'm actually involved in the fix? ;) fix it sooner rather than
> later.
>
> Just curious, after a release, how come the numbers are not
> automatically bumped to ensure this type thing gets caught sooner rather
> than later? Is it possible to automate this as part of the build
> process so that they get grabbed from some version information during
> the build?

Version bump is one of the few things we do at the start of development.
For 7.2, I didn't actually stamp the 7.2 release so I never bumped them,
or I forgot. Seems I also forgot for 7.1. It is listed in
tools/RELEASE_CHANGES so it is just a matter of following that file.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Janardhan 2002-12-11 02:41:31 Reusing Dead Tuples:
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-12-11 01:15:54 Re: [mail] Re: 7.4 Wishlist