Re: 7.4 Wishlist

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Date: 2002-12-03 05:28:39
Message-ID: 20021202212110.X64892-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:

> Now convert this query so that it only evaluates the date_part thing
> ONCE:

That's not a good idea as long as t.stamp varies from row to row. ;)
Perhaps once per row, maybe... :)

> select t.id, date_part('days',now()-t.stamp) from table_name t where
> date_part('days',now()-t.stamp) > 20;

Potentially I think something like this would do it:
select t.id, t.foo from (select id, date_part('days', now()-stamp)
as foo from table_name except select null, null) as t where foo>20;

It's not really an optimization given the required except, but if there
was some way to tell the system not to push clauses down into a subselect
you wouldn't even need that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2002-12-03 05:31:52 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-03 05:27:03 Re: 7.4 Wishlist

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2002-12-03 05:31:52 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-03 05:27:03 Re: 7.4 Wishlist

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2002-12-03 05:31:52 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-03 05:27:03 Re: 7.4 Wishlist