Re: idle connection timeout ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle connection timeout ...
Date: 2002-10-27 03:58:35
Message-ID: 200210270358.g9R3wZM09594@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:12:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Tom's idea of doing this as part of the already added per-user/per-db
> > settings seems like a good direction to take.
>
> Yes, but how? The current implementation has a setting column in
> pg_shadow, and another in pg_database. Is the idea to create a separate
> pg_settings table or something like that?

Are you asking how to do per-db-user combination settings, like User A
can have only two connections to database B? Seems we should get
per-user and per-db settings working first and see if anyone needs
combination settings.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-10-27 04:09:11 Re: idle connection timeout ...
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-10-27 03:27:18 Re: idle connection timeout ...