| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: idle connection timeout ... |
| Date: | 2002-10-27 03:27:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20021027032718.GB11252@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:12:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Tom's idea of doing this as part of the already added per-user/per-db
> settings seems like a good direction to take.
Yes, but how? The current implementation has a setting column in
pg_shadow, and another in pg_database. Is the idea to create a separate
pg_settings table or something like that?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"In Europe they call me Niklaus Wirth; in the US they call me Nickel's worth.
That's because in Europe they call me by name, and in the US by value!"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-27 03:58:35 | Re: idle connection timeout ... |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-10-27 03:26:48 | beta3 packaged ... |