Re: One 7.3 item left

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One 7.3 item left
Date: 2002-10-24 03:02:45
Message-ID: 200210240302.g9O32jx03140@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > >> OK, we are down to one open item, related to pg_dumping on 64-bit off_t.
> > >> We had discussion today on this so it should be completed shortly.
> >
> > > I hate to spoil the fun, but we have at least the Linux + Perl
> > > 5.8.1 + _GNU_SOURCE and the AIX + Large File + Flex problems to fix.
> >
> > We should not, however, wait longer before pushing out a beta3 release.
> > Portability problems on individual platforms may hold up RC1, but we're
> > overdue to put out a final beta...
>
> Was just about to ask that ... Friday sound reasonable for beta3 then?
> Bruce, can you have all your files updated by then?

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 03:11:44 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 02:56:01 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?