From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: One 7.3 item left |
Date: | 2002-10-23 01:14:19 |
Message-ID: | 20021022221328.D25737-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> OK, we are down to one open item, related to pg_dumping on 64-bit off_t.
> >> We had discussion today on this so it should be completed shortly.
>
> > I hate to spoil the fun, but we have at least the Linux + Perl
> > 5.8.1 + _GNU_SOURCE and the AIX + Large File + Flex problems to fix.
>
> We should not, however, wait longer before pushing out a beta3 release.
> Portability problems on individual platforms may hold up RC1, but we're
> overdue to put out a final beta...
Was just about to ask that ... Friday sound reasonable for beta3 then?
Bruce, can you have all your files updated by then?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-23 01:16:17 | Re: One 7.3 item left |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-23 01:13:19 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |