| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Date: | 2002-10-22 01:52:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200210220152.g9M1qDJ08004@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 20:47, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Here is a modified version of Philip's patch that has the changes Tom
> > suggested; treating off_t as an integral type. I did light testing on
> > my BSD/OS machine that has 8-byte off_t but I don't have 4 gigs of free
> > space to test larger files.
> I can make an account for anyone that wants to play on UnixWare 7.1.3.
If you have 7.3, you can just test this way:
1) apply the patch
2) run the regression tests
3) pg_dump -Fc regression >/tmp/x
4) pg_restore -Fc </tmp/x
That's all I did and it worked.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-10-22 02:05:09 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-10-22 01:50:07 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |