Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

From: Denis A Ustimenko <denis(at)oldham(dot)ru>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
Date: 2002-10-14 06:40:43
Message-ID: 20021014064043.GA538@denis.oldham.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:59:40PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> Well, if we were specifying the timeout in microseconds instead of seconds,
> it would make sense to have better resolution. But when you can only
> specify the timeout in seconds, the internal time comparison doesn't need
> to be any more accurate than seconds (IMHO anyway).

Actually we have the state machine in connectDBComplete() and the timeout is
set for machine as the whole. Therefore if 1 second timeout is seted for the
connectDBComplete() the timeout of particualr iteration of loop can be less
then 1 second.

--
Regards
Denis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alessio Bragadini 2002-10-14 13:39:37 Re: Changing Column Order (Was Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.)
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-14 06:13:46 Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vs PostgreSQL.