Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset

From: Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com>
To: "Simpson, Mike W" <mike(dot)simpson(at)pbs(dot)proquest(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset
Date: 2002-10-11 21:53:19
Message-ID: 20021011175319.68fc20c7.random@goblinstudios.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

But what if your data changes?

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:49:42 -0600
"Simpson, Mike W" <mike(dot)simpson(at)pbs(dot)proquest(dot)com> wrote:

> This definitely isn't my field, but in our code we're perfectly happy
> setting LIMIT and OFFSET. In combination with stored procedures,
> performance is excellent.
>
> If you really want a driver change, wouldn't it be simpler to just append
> LIMIT and OFFSET?
> Anytime setFetchSize is called, just tack on
> query+=" LIMIT "+getFetchSize()+" OFFSET "+rowPointer;
> and rs.next()/cursor code increment the rowPointer.
>
> Just my 2 cents...
> Mike
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2002-10-11 22:18:47 Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset
Previous Message Simpson, Mike W 2002-10-11 21:49:42 Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset