Nothing against including it from me ...
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, we need a decision on whether we are going to do a 7.2,3 or just
> >> have it in beta3. If it is in 7.2.3, I would not mention it in the
> >> beta3 release notes.
> > If there won't be any 7.2.3,
> There will be; I will backport the fixes today, and Marc promised to
> roll the tarball tonight.
> One thing I am undecided about: I am more than half tempted to put in
> the fix that makes us able to cope with mktime's broken-before-1970
> behavior in recent glibc versions (e.g., Red Hat 7.3). This seems like
> a good idea considering that other Linux distros will surely be updating
> glibc soon too. On the other hand, it's hard to call it a critical bug
> fix --- it ain't on a par with the vacuum/clog problem, for sure. And
> the patch has received only limited testing (basically just whatever
> use 7.3beta1 has had). On the third hand, the patch only does something
> if mktime() has already failed, so it's hard to see how it could make
> life worse even if it's buggy.
> Any votes on whether to fix that or leave it alone in 7.2.3? I need
> some input in the next few hours ...
> regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Sosteric||Date: 2002-09-30 17:04:48|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] arrays|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2002-09-30 16:55:11|
|Subject: Re: Do we want a CVS branch now?|