| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | justin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] New PostgreSQL Tool available : |
| Date: | 2002-09-26 01:26:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20020926.102621.41633053.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> You should have chosen a better foundation. pg_bench is notorious for
> producing results that are (a) nonrepeatable and (b) not relevant to
> a wide variety of situations. All it really tells you about is the
> efficiency of a large number of updates to a small number of rows.
You might want to try -N option of pgbench. It avoids updates to
branches and tellers tables.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-09-26 01:33:48 | Re: [HACKERS] New PostgreSQL Tool available :pg_autotune |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2002-09-26 00:47:57 | Re: rotatelog / logrotate with PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-09-26 01:33:48 | Re: [HACKERS] New PostgreSQL Tool available :pg_autotune |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-09-26 01:23:51 | Re: Web site |