Re: ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG
Date: 2002-09-25 08:38:10
Message-ID: 20020925083810.GA19538@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:53:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> *Everyone* who checks out from our CVS needs to build the bison output
> files. There seem to be quite a few such people; they will all be

I though time stamping is done to make sure the .c file is newer than
the .y one.

> forced to upgrade their local bison installations when ecpg starts
> requiring a newer bison.

Valid point.

> | Thanks for the report, this is addressed in 1.49c. We should upload
> | the latter soon.
>
> So I'm guessing that a full release is not just around the corner :-(

Argh.

But when we remove features from ecpg I would prefer to just remove
pretty obscure stuff and stuff introduced after 7.2 was released so we
won't break much. Does anyone have a list of newly added commands? Or do
I have to get the diff from CVS?

Michael

--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

  • Re: ECPG at 2002-09-24 13:53:10 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2002-09-25 09:38:08 [akim@epita.fr: Re: bison 1.49 release]
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2002-09-25 06:54:56 Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP