From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Restore from pre-v7.3 -> v7.3 (Was: Re: RPMS for 7.3 beta.) |
Date: | 2002-09-19 01:21:13 |
Message-ID: | 20020918221854.H53125-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am waiting the result of the pg_dump from 7.2.x to 7.3 restore discussion.
>
> Right. We clearly have to support loading of 7.2 dumps; the only issue
> in my mind is exactly how we kluge that up ;-). I just talked to Bruce
> about this a little bit, and we came to the conclusion that there are
> two plausible-looking paths:
>
> 1. Relax CREATE LANGUAGE to accept either LANGUAGE_HANDLER or OPAQUE as
> the datatype of the function (ie, make it work more like CREATE TRIGGER
> does).
>
> 2. Hack CREATE LANGUAGE so that if it's pointed at an OPAQUE-returning
> function, it actually updates the recorded return type of the function
> in pg_proc to say LANGUAGE_HANDLER.
Stupid question, but why not just create an upgrade script that does any
required translations external to the database?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-09-19 01:28:52 | Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-09-19 00:12:27 | Re: BLOB |