Re: RPMS for 7.3 beta.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RPMS for 7.3 beta.
Date: 2002-09-18 19:17:21
Message-ID: 200209181917.g8IJHLa17196@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Sounds good. I think the earliest we could be ready for beta2 is the
> > end of this week; sometime next week may be more realistic.
> >
> > Given that we'll be forcing an initdb for beta2 anyway, those who use
> > RPMs may be just as happy to have missed beta1.
>
> If an initdb is planned - did that split->split_part or whatever change make
> it in?

Yes, it did, and in fact if you didn't initdb after the patch was
applied, you would see regression failures.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-18 20:00:41 Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2002-09-18 17:45:47 Re: The notorious to_char bug