Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-12 16:04:03
Message-ID: 200209121604.g8CG43J02210@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

scott.marlowe wrote:
> > Seems like the NT4 users are left out in the cold though until we add
> > some kind of ability for PostgreSQL to not look at the filesystem for
> > info about where to put the xlog files.
>
> This isn't true. With the resource kit, you get the gnu utils, and ln
> works a charm under NT4 with ntfs. And not just for directories, but
> files as well. Unless Microsoft somehow removed that functionality in the
> intervening years since I've used NT. (wouldn't put it past them, but I
> doubt they have.)

Yes, this is what I remember, that Cygwin had symlinks, and at that time
that was the only Win32 OS we supported. Now, with native Win32 port
coming, we have to figure out what is available.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. OConnor 2002-09-12 16:09:34 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-09-12 15:55:49 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?