| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com |
| Cc: | oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, depesz(at)depesz(dot)pl, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request |
| Date: | 2002-09-03 22:07:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200209032207.g83M72e03006@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com wrote:
>
> Yep! ltree is Faaaast , and i use it at the moment.
>
> But will it work in INGRES,DB2 or ORACLE ?
> what if tommorow my boss ask me to use ORACLE?
>
> I have similar issues in using intarray & arrays in PGSQL
>
> though reasons of shifting to others dbs are diminishing
> with every major release of PG ;-)
No it will only work on PostgreSQL. If those other apps had loadable
types, you might be able to do it by rewriting the code to match their
API.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | knut.suebert | 2002-09-04 17:46:08 | Re: tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request of comment from joe celko) |
| Previous Message | mallah | 2002-09-03 21:59:54 | Re: tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request |