Re: contrib features during beta period

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib features during beta period
Date: 2002-08-30 14:35:39
Message-ID: 200208301035.39264.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 30 August 2002 09:29 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Does this mean we should be looking for a way to integrate [FTI] into the
> > main backend at this point? Isn't that what contrib is for?

> Well, given that Chris also thinks that people should migrate to
> tsearch, I'd guess that fulltextindex would not be the one to integrate.
> But yeah, in the long run I'd like to see one of these packages become
> mainstream, just because full-text search is such a widely used feature.

Agreed. We don't really have guidelines for this process; any idea what was
the last module moved over like that? There may be more modules to consider
-- earthdistance, for instance, which has been with us for a long time.

> The more global point here is that during beta we need everyone to be
> doing testing, bug fixing, and documentation, not new features ---
> even if they're in contrib. Goodness knows there's not very much
> organization to the Postgres project, but let's try to respect what
> little process we do have...

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-30 14:46:10 Re: Accessing original TupleDesc from SRF
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 14:21:57 Re: Accessing original TupleDesc from SRF