Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-08-27 19:35:41
Message-ID: 200208271535.41986.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 27 August 2002 03:19 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think we need to resolve this discussion from a week ago. The current
> code is this:

I thought it WAS resolved, to do:

> global usernames are stored just like before, e.g. postgres
> local users are stored as user(at)dbname
> when connecting, global users add '@' to their names
> when connecting, local users use just their user name, no @dbname

> Tom likes this because it is the fewer global users who have to append
> the '@'.

At least that was my perception of the uneasy consensus reached.

Basically, this tags the @ as magic saying, during the client connect process,
'I'm GLOBAL, treat me differently'. Now that I actually understand how this
is supposed to work, which your four lines above elucidate nicely, I am in
more agreement than I was that this is the right answer to this issue.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 19:39:00 Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-27 19:25:23 Re: SET SCHEMA?