Re: Open 7.3 items

OK, the vote is not shifting from '.' to '@'. Is that how we want to
go? I like the pg_user enhancement. Marc, comments? This was your baby.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 06:00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > > Well, they aren't separate fields so you can't ORDER BY domain. The dot
> > > > was used so it looks like a schema based on dbname.
>
> IMHO it should look like an user in domain ;)
>
> > > Sorry, I know it's a single field and that there is no split()
> > > function (that I'm aware of), but that seems like such a small and
> > > easy to fix problem that I personally place a higher value on the more
> > > standard nomeclature and use of an @ sign. I understand the value of
> > > . for schemas and whatnot, but isn't a user going to be in their own
> > > schema to begin with? As for the order by, I've got a list of users
> > > per "account" (sales account), so doing the order by is on two columns
> > > and the pg_shadow table is generated periodically from our inhouse
> > > tables. -sc
> >
> > I have no personal preference between period and @ or whatever. See if
> > you can get some other votes for @ because most left @ when the ORDER BY
> > idea came up from Marc.
>
> I still like @ . And I posted code that could be put in the pg_user view
> to split out domain you could ORDER BY.
>
> > As for it being a special character, it really isn't because the code
> > prepends the database name and a period. It doesn't look to see if
> > there is a period in the already or anything.
> -----------
> Hannu
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073