| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | mail(at)joeconway(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function |
| Date: | 2002-08-10 06:51:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20020810.155126.94070513.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Any objection if I rework this function to meet SQL92 and fix the bug?
I don't object.
> Or is the SQL92 part not desirable because it breaks backward
> compatability?
I don't think so.
> In any case, can the #ifdef MULTIBYTE's be removed now in favor of a
> test for encoding max length?
Sure.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff MacDonald | 2002-08-10 12:17:28 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:32:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-10 09:50:39 | Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-08-10 05:32:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-10 09:58:17 | Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-10 05:16:20 | Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT |