| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'PostgreSQL general list' <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] []performance issues |
| Date: | 2002-08-02 18:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20020802141109.R8966@mail.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:57:16AM -0600, David Blood wrote:
>
> Count() is slow even on your Sun server with 16gb ram? How big is the
> database?
Well, just relatively slow! It's always going to be relatively slow
to seqscan a few million records. We have some tables which have
maybe 4 or 4.5 million records in them. (I don't spend a lot of time
count()ing them ;-)
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ngpg | 2002-08-02 18:27:44 | Re: []performance issues |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-08-02 18:09:54 | Re: System catalog and identifying |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ngpg | 2002-08-02 18:27:44 | Re: []performance issues |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-08-02 18:09:58 | Re: Open 7.3 items |