| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | richt(at)multera(dot)com, "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR) |
| Date: | 2002-07-17 22:43:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20020717224339.968B31C6D@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On July 17, 2002 05:45 pm, Richard Tucker wrote:
> We also have implemented a roll forward recovery mechanism. We modified a
> 7.2.1 version of Postgres.
> ...
Excellent! I can't wait. When will it be in current?
> The BIG THING we have not done is address the issue that add/drop tables
> and indexes do not propagate through the roll forward recovery mechanism
> properly.
I can live with that. Schemas shouldn't change so often that you can't just
dup any changes to the backup(s).
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Tucker | 2002-07-17 22:55:55 | Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-07-17 22:33:22 | Re: error codes |