Re: datatype matrix (was: Re: Sorry..)

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Kevin Brannen <kevinb(at)nurseamerica(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: datatype matrix (was: Re: Sorry..)
Date: 2002-07-17 08:27:48
Message-ID: 20020717102748.A11609@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:37:04PM -0500, Kevin Brannen wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Christopher,
> >
> >
> >>In the bad old days when we couldn't distinguish explicit from implicit
> >>cast functions, I was wary of adding new cast pathways. Too many
> >>implicit casts and you have no type system at all. But in 7.3 there
> >>should be no reason to object to an explicit-only cast from numeric
> >>to text or vice versa.
> >
> >
> > I'd suggest making the explicit cast of numeric to text be the exact
> > equivalent of:
> >
> > SELECT btrim(to_char(numeric, '999,999,999,999.9999999999'))
> > or similar.

Note: the btrim() call is needless. You can use Fill-Mode:

SELECT to_char(numeric, 'FM999,999,999,999.9999999999');
^^^
It's in docs :-)

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2002-07-17 09:29:16 Re: Indexing UNIONs
Previous Message Dror Matalon 2002-07-17 07:20:30 Large objects and Meta Data