From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-10 17:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 20020710145152.F43060-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
PostgreSQL, Inc has a commercial replication available, and I understand
there is a fair amount of activity going on with the PgReplication project
as well ...
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ben wrote:
> Replication would help that. Our company would gladly use Postgres instead
> of MS SQL Server if postgres could do replication.
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > PostgreSQL's real marketing problem is that it's too good to be
> > needed by the MySQL crowd (or they switch), and it's not a big
> > commercial package for the we-need-a-big-commercial-package crowd.
> > It's far from obvious that a name change would help in the latter
> > case, which is the real market potential. I wish I know what _would_
> > help that, though, in the absence of (sigh) Great Bridge.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2002-07-10 18:15:09 | was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-07-10 17:45:36 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |