Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION
Date: 2002-07-08 01:04:47
Message-ID: 20020708.100447.104048990.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So I withdraw my earlier comment. But perhaps the syntax of the proposed
> command could be aligned with the CREATE TRANSLATION command.

Ok. What about this?

CREATE CONVERSION <conversion name>
FOR <encoding name>
TO <encoding name>
FROM <conversion routine name>

DROP CONVERSION <conversion name>

BTW, I wonder if we should invent new access privilege for conversion.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-08 01:50:33 Re: [HACKERS] Non-standard feature request
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-07 23:43:01 Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)