From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? |
Date: | 2002-06-28 19:29:37 |
Message-ID: | 200206281929.g5SJTbL25384@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
> >> TODO says we don't...
>
> > TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.
>
> A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
> docs are wrong ...
Oh, OK. In the future, the "A moment's examination" swipe isn't
required. :-( I suppose it makes you feel better.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-06-28 19:35:21 | Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-28 19:21:33 | Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? |