Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > With no solution on the horizon, and the author saying it fixes some of
> > his trigger queries, I am inclined to apply this.  I don't see any
> > downside except for some extra pfrees if we ever fix this.
> 
> Sure, apply away.  I was mainly expressing my angst over the lack of
> a system-wide solution.

Sure, many of the patches I do exist for only a few releases, but they
meet users needs until a better solution comes along.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: Patch for memory leaks in index scan at 2002-06-20 21:28:22 from Tom Lane

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2002-06-20 23:48:24
	Subject: Re: pg_dumpall should permit quiet operation
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2002-06-20 21:28:22
	Subject: Re: Patch for memory leaks in index scan

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2002-06-20 23:09:02
	Subject: Re: Reduce heap tuple header size
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2002-06-20 21:36:52
	Subject: Re: Reduce heap tuple header size