| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bill Cunningham <billc(at)ballydev(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Schemas: status report, call for developers |
| Date: | 2002-06-08 04:42:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200206080442.g584gKJ09199@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane wrote:
> If you don't create schemas then you get backwards-compatible behavior
> (all the users end up sharing the "public" schema as their current
> schema).
I am a little uncomfortable about this. It means that CREATE TABLE will
create a table in 'public' if the user doesn't have a schema of their
own, and in their private schema if it exists. I seems strange to have
such a distinction based on whether a private schema exists. Is this OK?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-08 04:47:56 | Re: Internals question about buffers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-08 04:10:34 | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-08 04:53:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Schemas: status report, call for developers |
| Previous Message | Bob Lapique | 2002-06-07 16:52:17 | database structure / generic client apps |