Re: PL/pgSQL TODO

OK, found it, attached, from April 17. It is still sitting in my
"review" email box to be summarized into the TODO list. In fact, I have
~30 emails from that thread that i have to re-read and summarize.

Tom is right, I would have reviewed it by now if it wasn't for my
vacation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > I have reached this message and I your TODO item discussion was:
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=20020517114156.Q20428-100000%40megazone23.bigpanda.com&rnum=18&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DJosh%2BBerkus%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D20020517114156.Q20428-100000%2540megazone23.bigpanda.com%26rnum%3D18
>
> Nope. Wrong discussion. I'm referring to a 14-item list John Proctor
> and I composed to enhance PL/pgSQL and make it equal to Oracle's
> PL/SQL. I'll dig through my sent mail and find it.
>
> Not that the statement-deferrable constraints would be a bad thing, at
> all.
>
> -Josh
>
> ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
> Josh Berkus
> Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
> for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
> and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026