Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Date: 2002-05-29 00:35:52
Message-ID: 200205290035.g4T0ZqR23487@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2002 21:00:43 -0400 (EDT)
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > TODO updated:
> >
> > Add BSD-licensed qsort() for 32-bit Solaris
>
> Is this necessary? Didn't someone say that Sun had acknowledged the
> performance problem and were going to be releasing a patch for it?
> If that patch exists (or will exist), it would probably be better to
> suggest in the docs that users of 32-bit Solaris apply the patch.

Sun said they would look at it (actually McNeeley (sp?)), but I haven't
seen any mention of a patch.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 00:37:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-29 00:04:05 Re: Invalid length of startup packet

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 00:37:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-28 22:56:09 Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql