| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |
| Date: | 2002-05-09 11:51:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20020509084804.E32524-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
>
> Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
> separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?
Ummmm ... no? We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business
... gborg would be a good place for any of this ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-05-09 12:35:08 | Re: Regression tests and NOTICE statements |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-05-09 10:07:58 | Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader |