Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior
Date: 2002-04-19 05:00:52
Message-ID: 20020419010052.641fe05b.alvherre@atentus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

En Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> escribió:

> I agree that name is better, I wasn't sure if we'd reached a consensus on
> it or if the conversation drifted away due to the fact that noone was
> looking at it at the time.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2001-09/msg00234.php

Nobody opposed to the idea of name ordering in that thread.

But note that this is on TODO:

* Allow user to control trigger firing order

That probably means that the user should have some reasonable way to
change the name, besides fiddling with system catalogs.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra este seca" (Orual)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-19 05:04:50 Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-04-19 04:49:44 Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-19 05:04:50 Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-04-19 03:43:54 Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior