Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Date: 2002-04-17 21:41:43
Message-ID: 200204172141.g3HLfhb06119@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Loftis wrote:
> As far as the 'planner benchmark suite' so we cans tart gathering more
> statistical data about what costs should be, or are better at, that's an
> excellent idea.

People with different hardware have different random page costs,
clearly. Even different workloads affect it. Added to TODO:

* Add utility to compute accurate random_page_cost value

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-04-17 21:44:13 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-17 21:39:04 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE