| From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: help with bison |
| Date: | 2002-04-11 16:02:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20020411120238.7e967bb7.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:36:49 -0700
"Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Will this allow you to pass bytea data as binary data in the parameters
> section (ability to bind values to parameters) or will this still
> require that the data be passed as a text string that the parser needs
> to parse.
The patch I'm working on would require that the parameters
are still parsed, so it would likely suffer from the same
performance problems.
I'm unsure how to fix this without a change to the FE/BE
protocol (and even then, it wouldn't be trivial). Suggestions?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-04-11 16:03:06 | Re: Deadlock situation using foreign keys (reproduceable) |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-11 16:00:16 | Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate |