Re: psql and output from \?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: psql and output from \?
Date: 2002-03-15 16:27:13
Message-ID: 200203151627.g2FGRDa15386@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2002 22:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I guess some of these weren't introduces by you, but if someone is
> > > > going to fix this, he might as well take care of these.
> > >
> > > Will submit another patch in the morning (it's late here).
> >
> > Ian, do you have another version of this patch ready?
>
> Patch attached (diff against CVS, replacing previous patch).
>
> Ian Barwick

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas F. O'Connell 2002-03-15 17:22:35 Re: Time for 7.2.1?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-15 16:19:15 Re: timestamp_part() bug?