Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Date: 2002-03-11 23:00:30
Message-ID: 200203112300.g2BN0U426225@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of
> >> function args?
>
> > Yes, they are related. At least I think so.
>
> They have to be exactly the same, because both are tied to the size
> of the oidvector type.

And because oidvector has to be a fixed length, we are have overhead in
increasing it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-11 23:34:36 Re: psql and output from \?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-11 22:59:09 Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS