Re: Adding qualification conditions to EXPLAIN output

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding qualification conditions to EXPLAIN output
Date: 2002-03-09 23:43:08
Message-ID: 200203092343.g29Nh8V21237@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Question for the group: does this seem valuable enough to put into the
> standard EXPLAIN output, or should it be a special option? I can
> imagine showing it only in EXPLAIN VERBOSE's summary display, or adding
> a GUC variable to enable it, or adding another option keyword to
> EXPLAIN, but I don't much want to do any of those things. On the other
> hand, maybe this stuff won't make any sense to non-experts anyway.
> Thoughts?

I like EXPLAIN VERBOSE for that. GUC seems overkill.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-09 23:43:16 Re: [PATCHES] Small fix for _equalValue()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-09 23:02:17 Adding qualification conditions to EXPLAIN output