Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life

From: "Mattew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)rh71(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)idealx(dot)com>, Alex Avriette <a_avriette(at)acs(dot)org>
Cc: "'Jean-Paul ARGUDO'" <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)idealx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sdinot(at)idealx(dot)com, dbarth(at)idealx(dot)com, nicolas(dot)niclausse(at)idealx(dot)com
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life
Date: 2002-02-27 23:35:33
Message-ID: 200202272331.g1RNVuU29875@neuromancer.ctlno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> shared_buffers = 19000 # 2*max_connections, min 16

This number sounds too high. If you only have 256M RAM, this is using over
150 of it. Are you swapping alot? What is the load on the server while it's
runing?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-02-28 00:01:44 Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-27 23:04:09 Re: missing foreign key fails silently using COPY