Re: MySQL/InnoDB benchmarks

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB benchmarks
Date: 2002-02-21 18:40:00
Message-ID: 200202211840.g1LIe0Z28106@saturn.janwieck.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc Lavergne wrote:
>
> Granted it's still slower than the InnoDB results and I did test against
> 7.2, but I'm sure with a little tweaking I could almost halve my times.
> I have to agree with the others, something looks awful funny about their
> results! However, I would add that it's all a moot point really since
> the benchmark doesn't even attempt to test concurrent transactions but
> that's probably for a reason! ;-)

All they have shown so far is that they can read our mailing
lists. The SMP problems in 7.1.1 are well known, yawn.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-21 18:42:12 fmgr_info: function 20071: cache lookup failed
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-02-21 18:21:21 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??