Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date: 2002-02-20 04:12:11
Message-ID: 20020220000454.Y88546-100000@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


this isn't making any sense, unless the qmail installation that Vince has
running for relaying is hosed? The queue on postgresql.org itself is near
empty, and looking at the full headers for recent messages, delays are
quite small except for those postings that have to be approved ...

The thing is, I know I saw a thread between you and Tom with a subject of
elog ...

I'm still looking ...

On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Then why are these emails getting through. They start with SET NULL?
> >
> > Well, no they start with "Re:", that appeared on the list today was actually
> > sent about 2 weeks ago.
>
> This is getting bad. Marc, we need to know what is happening. Tom Lane
> says he gets email when something is stalled for approval but I have
> never gotten one.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-02-20 05:46:51 ignore this one ...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-20 03:30:02 Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL