Re: Database Performance?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Berger <rwb(at)vtiscan(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database Performance?
Date: 2002-02-18 18:43:46
Message-ID: 20020218103854.L75404-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Robert Berger wrote:
> > This argument is out of date. MySQL currently supports
> > transactions, foreign
> > keys, and outer joins. (4.1 will support subselects)
> >
> > As for fault tolerance, MySQL has built in support for replication.
> >
> > A couple years ago I converted a project from MySQL to PostgreSQL
> > because
> > of MySQL's lack of features. I am now in the process of converting
> > back to
> > MySQL because of the performance improvements and replication.
>
> Just stating "support of foreign keys" is IMHO a little
> fuzzy. Are referential actions supported (ON UPDATE/DELETE
> CASCADE, SET DEFAULT and SET NULL)? Can constraint checks be
> deferred? Are multi-key references supported? If so, what
> about match types?

From a quick look at the docs the docs it appears the answers are no, no,
probably, I don't think so. Admittedly our support is a little weak
(a few bugs, the for update locking issues, and lack of match partial),
but theirs is still a little behind, although I'd guess that 4.1 will
probably start adding some of these things.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2002-02-18 18:59:23 Re: Looking for a function
Previous Message Serkan Bektaş 2002-02-18 18:42:29 MDB 2 POSTGRESQL MIGRATION PROBLEM