Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
Cc: Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, alavoor <alavoor(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-21 20:53:16
Message-ID: 200201212053.g0LKrGU10340@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Ned Wolpert wrote:

Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 09:12, Jason Earl wrote:
> > We have always used the BSD license and believe the GPL is for
> > hippies and communists :).
>
> OT: I thought GPL was for communists and BSD was for hippies? ;-)

Way off topic: I think it is GPL/communism vs. BSD/socialism.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-21 21:12:58 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Ned Wolpert 2002-01-21 20:51:08 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-21 21:12:58 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Ned Wolpert 2002-01-21 20:51:08 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL