Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny
Date: 2002-01-18 05:53:25
Message-ID: 200201180553.g0I5rPa23017@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Well, we had the discussion when Jan was adding TOAST, and Jan was
> > saying we still need large objects for I/O purposes and for very large
> > items.
>
> Though I've often seen the reference to bytea BLOB
> I remember no clear negation. Don't we have to negate
> it clearly from the first ?

As I remember, we only mention BLOB when people ask. We don't refer to
either as BLOB, only as TOAST/bytea and large objects.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-18 05:54:09 Re: age() function?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-18 05:48:46 Re: [PATCHES] guc